Comparing the effectiveness of Gottman's couple therapy with Glasser's reality-based couple therapy on cognitive flexibility and sense of coherence in couples with conflict

Authors
Abstract
One of the fundamental indicators in explaining the quality of marital relationships is marital conflict, which, if managed ineffectively, becomes one of the main grounds for tension and the breakdown of family relationships. The present study compared the effectiveness of Gottman couple therapy with Glasser’s reality therapy-based couple therapy on cognitive flexibility and sense of coherence in couples experiencing conflict. The statistical population of the study consisted of couples referred to the Zehn Ara Psychology Clinic in Tehran in the year 1404 (2025–2026) due to marital conflict. The sampling method was convenience and purposeful. To collect data, the Dennis and Vander Wal (2010) Cognitive Flexibility Questionnaire and Antonovsky (1993) Sense of Coherence Questionnaire were used. Data were analyzed using multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA). The findings showed that Gottman couple therapy was more effective than Glasser’s reality therapy on cognitive flexibility and sense of coherence in women experiencing conflict. It can be concluded that Gottman couple therapy is more effective in improving cognitive flexibility and sense of coherence in women with marital conflict. Therefore, based on the research findings, it can be utilized to reduce problems in individuals experiencing marital conflicts.
Keywords

1. Antosh, D. D., & Megahed, N. N. (2021). Sexual Function After Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics, 48(3), 639-651
2. Chen، Z. J.، Davis، D. E. (2021). Religious Homogamy Affects the Connections of Personality and Marriage Qualities to Unforgiving Motives: Implications for Couple Therapy. Religions، 12(11)، 917
3. Clauss K, Gorday JY, Bardeen JR. Eye tracking evidence of threat-related attentional bias in anxiety-and fear-related disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev 2022; 1(93): 102142
4. Finney, J.W., Hall, M. H., & Brogen, L. A (2021). Meaning assignment structures/schemas, emotional states and cognitive processing of emotional information: Comparison of two conceptual framework. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, 42, 312-326
5. Gottman, J. & Gottman, J. (2017). The natural principles of love. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 9(1), 7-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12182
6. Karmakar، G. (2021). Body، sexuality، marriage and feminism: an interview with Jane Gallop. Journal of Gender Studies،
7. Kim HS, Nho J, Nam J.(2021). A serial multiple mediator model of sense of coherence, coping strategies, depression, and quality of life among gynecologic cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Eur J Oncol Nurs, 54(1), 1-14.
8. Ma Y, Chen X, Nunez A, Yan M, Zhang B, Zhao F.(2021). Influences of parenting on adolescents’ empathy through the intervening effects of self-integrity and sense of coherence. Children and Youth Services Review, 116(1), 105-110
9. Nolvi M, Brogardh C, Jacobsson L, Lexell J.(2022). Sense of coherence and coping behaviours in persons with late effects of polio. Ann Phys Rehabil Med, 65(3), 1-7.
10. Robati M, Namani E.(2021). Relationship between Vitality and Sense of Psychosocial Coherence with Nurses' Quality of Work Life: the Role Mediating of Self-Differentiation. Journal of Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, 27(6), 743-51
11. Sevier-Guy LJ, Ferreira N, Somerville C, Gillanders D. (2021) Psychological flexibility and fear of recurrence in prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)
12. Xu, J. Li, Q. Gao, Z. Ji, P. Ji, Q. Song, M. Chen, Y. Sun, H. Wang, X. Zhang, L & Guo, L. (2025). Impact of cancer-related fatigue on quality of life in patients with cancer: multiple mediating roles of psychological coherence and stigma. BMC cancer, 25(1), 64-9
13. Zhang, J., Zheng, L., Zhang, S., Xu, W., & Zheng, Y. (2019). Vocal characteristics predict infidelity intention and relationship commitment in men but not in women. Personality and Individual Differences, 168, 110389