بررسی ویژگی‌های روانسنجی نسخه فارسی مقیاس همدلی عاطفی، شناختی و جسمانی بزرگسالان

نویسندگان
آرزو لشکری 1
تورج هاشمی نصرت آبادی 2
1 دانشگاه اصفهان
2 دانشگاه تبریز
چکیده
مقیاس همدلی شناختی، عاطفی و جسمی ساختار سه مولفه جدیدی از همدلی را پیشنهاد می­کند. هدف از این پژوهش بررسی ویژگی های روان ­سنجی مقیاس همدلی شناختی، عاطفی و جسمانی بود. روش پژوهش حاضر از نوع همبستگی بود. جامعه آماری کلیه دانشجویان دامنه سنی 18 تا 50 سال ایرانی در سال­تحصیلی 1401-1402 بودند که به روش نمونه­گیری در دسترس انتخاب شدند. ابزارهای مورد استفاده در پژوهش شامل مقیاس همدلی شناختی، عاطفی و جسمانی(CASES)، مقیاس واکنش بین فردی(IRI) ، پرسشنامه، الکسی تیمیای پرس (PAQ) مقیاس تجربه زمانی لذّت بودند. داده های پژوهش به روش تحلیل عاملی تأییدی ، (CFA) آلفای کرونباخ و ضریب پیرسون با استفاده از نرمافزارهای SPSS 24 و Lisrel 8 تجزیه وتحلیل شدند. پایایی پرسشنامه با استفاده از روش همسانی درونی محاسبه شد. برای به دست آوردن اعتبار همگرا نیز از پرسشنامه­های الکسی­تایمیا پرس (2018)، مقیاس واکنش بین­فردی دیویس (1983) مقیاس تجربه زمانی لذت گارد (2006) استفاده شد. نتایج حاصل از محاسبه پایایی با استفاده از ضریب آلفای کرونباخ، ضریب الفای بالاتر از 70/0 را نشان داد. تحلیل عاملی تائیدی نیز نشان داد که راه­ حل سه عاملی از برازش مناسب­تری برخوردار است. نتیجه تحلیل همبستگی از اعتبار این مقیاس و به ویژه جداسازی همدلی جسمانی از همدلی عاطفی پشتیبانی می­کند. براساس نتایج این پژوهش، می­توان نتیجه گرفت که مقیاس همدلی عاطفی، شناختی و جسمانی از پایایی و اعتبار مناسب برخوردار است و مولفه­ها را از هم متمایز می­سازد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
همدلی
همدلی شناختی
همدلی عاطفی
همدلی جسمانی
پایایی
روایی

عنوان مقاله English

Psychometric investigation of the Persian Version of the Cognitive, Affective, and Somatic Empathy Scale (CASES) for Adults

نویسندگان English

arezou lashkari 1
Touraj Hashemi Nosrat Abadi 2
1 University of Isfahan
2 Tabriz University
چکیده English

The Cognitive, Affective, and Somatic Empathy Scale (CASES) proposes a new three-component structure of empathy. The aim of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Cognitive, Affective, and Somatic Empathy Scale, the statistical population consisted of all students aged 18 to 50 years studying at Tabriz University in the academic year 2022-2023, selected through convenience sampling. The instruments used in the study included the CASES, the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI), the Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire (PAQ), and the Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale. Data were analyzed using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Cronbach's alpha, and Pearson's coefficient with SPSS 24 and Lisrel 8 software. The reliability of the questionnaire was calculated using internal consistency methods. For convergent validity, the Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire (2018), Davis’s Interpersonal Reactivity Index (1983), and Gard’s Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale (2006) were used. The results of reliability calculation using Cronbach's alpha showed coefficients above 0.70. Confirmatory Factor Analysis also indicated that the three-factor solution had a better fit. The correlation analysis results support the validity of this scale. Based on the results of this research, it can be concluded that the Cognitive, Affective, and Somatic Empathy Scale has appropriate reliability and validity.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

empathy
cognitive empathy
emotional empathy
somatic empathy
Reliability
Validity
Alavi, kh., Asghari Moghadam, M., RahimiNezhad, A.,Farahai, H. (2018). Psychometric featuers of Persian version of temporal experince of pleasue in university students, Journal of Applied Psychology, 4(44), 597-615 [In Persian] https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/1328356/
Banzhaf, C., Hoffmann, F., Kanske, P., Fan, Y., Walter, H., Spengler, S., ... & Bermpohl, F. (2018). Interacting and dissociable effects of alexithymia and depression on empathy. Psychiatry research, 270, 631-638.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.10.‌‌‌045
Baron-Cohen, S. & Wheelwright, S. (2004). “The Empathy Quotient: An investigation of adults with asperger syndrome or high functioning autism and normal sex differences”. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(2): 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JADD.0000022607.19833.00
Baron‐Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Lawson, J., Griffin, R., & Hill, J. (2002). The exact mind: Empathizing and systemizing in autism spectrum conditions. Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development, 491-508
Basto-Pereira, M., & Farrington, D. P. (2021). The Basic Empathy Scale: psychometric properties and contributions to the understanding of antisocial behavior. In Empathy versus Offending, Aggression, and Bullying (pp. 11-29). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429287459-3/
Batson, C. D. (2010). Empathy-induced altruistic motivation. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature (pp. 15–34). American Psychological Association. https://doi.
org/10.1037/12061-001
Blair, R. J. R. (2005). Responding to the emotions of others: dissociating forms of empathy through the study of typical and psychiatric populations. Consciousness and cognition, 14(4), 698-718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2005.06.004
Buss, A. H. and Perry, M. (1992). The Aggression Questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 63 (3), 452-459. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.452
Chen, F. R., Fung, A. L. C., & Raine, A. (2021). The cognitive, affective, and somatic empathy scales (CASES): Cross-cultural replication and specificity to different forms of aggression and victimization. Journal of personality assessment, 103(1), 80-91.DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2019.1677246
Chrysikou, E. G., & Thompson, W. J. (2016). Assessing Cognitive and Affective Empathy Through the Interpersonal Reactivity Index: An Argument Against a Two-Factor Model. Assessment, 23(6), 769-777. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191115599055
Comrey, A. L. (1988). Factor -analytic methods of scale development in personality and clinical psychology. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology , 56(5), 754 -761. DOI: 10.1037/0022 -006X.56.5.754
Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of personality and social psychology, 44(1), 113. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
Dickman, S. (1985). Impulsivity and perception: Individual differences in the processing of the local and global dimensions of stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(1), 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.1.133.
Duarte, J., Pinto-Gouveia, J., & Cruz, B. (2016). Relationships between nurses’ empathy, self-compassion and dimensions of professional quality of life: A cross-sectional study. International journal of nursing studies, 60, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.02.015
Eklund, J. H., & Meranius, M. S. (2021). Toward a consensus on the nature of empathy: A review of reviews. Patient Education and Counseling, 104(2), 300-307.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2020.08.022
Fatima, M., & Babu, N. (2023). Cognitive and Affective Empathy in Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Meta-analysis. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-023-00364-8
FeizAbadi, Z., Farzad, V., ShahrAray, M. (2008). Cofimatory and exploratory factor analysis of interpersonal reactive inventory , Journal of Psychology & Education, 38(3), 157-178. [In Persian] https://www.sid.ir/paper/55697/fa
Gard, D. E., Gard, M. G., Kring, A. M., & John, O. P. (2006). Anticipatory and consummatory components of the experience of pleasure: A scale development study. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(6): 1086-1102 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.11.001
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2019). IBM SPSS statistics 26 step by step: A simple guide and reference. Routledge https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429056765
‌‌‌‌‌ di Giacomo, E., Andreini, E., Lorusso, O., & Clerici, M. (2023). The dark side of empathy in narcissistic personality disorder. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, 1074558. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1074558
Girotto, L. C., Moreira, R. D. F. C., Esteves, A., & Tempski, P. Z. (2022). Assessment tools for evaluating empathy in health professions students: A systematic review. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1623797/v1
Hojat, M., Mangione, S., Nasca, T. J., Cohen, M. J., Gonnella, J. S., Erdmann, J. B., ... & Magee, M. (2001). The Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy: development and preliminary psychometric data. Educational and psychological measurement, 61(2), 349-365. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640121971158
Hong, H., & Han, A. (2020). A systematic review on empathy measurement tools for care professionals. Educational Gerontology, 46(2), 72-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2020.1712058
Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/CahyonoSt/publication/361910413_Principles_and_Practice_of_Structural_Equation_Modeling/links/62cc4f0ed7bd92231faa4db1/Principles-and-Practice-of-Structural-Equation-Modeling.pdf
Lashkari, A., Dehghani, M., Sadeghi-Firoozabadi, V., Heidari, M., & Khatibi, A. (2021). Further Support for the Psychometric Properties of the Farsi Version of Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire. Frontiers in psychology, 1294. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.657660
Liu, J., Qiao, X., Dong, F., & Raine, A. (2018). The Chinese version of the cognitive, affective, and somatic empathy scale for children: Validation, gender invariance and associated factors. PloS one, 13(5), e0195268. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195268
McQuarrie, A. M., Smith, S. D., & Jakobson, L. S. (2023). Alexithymia and sensory processing sensitivity account for unique variance in the prediction of emotional contagion and empathy. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1072783.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1072783
Mehrabian, A., & Epstein, N. (1972). A measure of emotional empathy. Journal of Personality, 40(4), 525–543. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1972.tb00078.x
Morelli, S. A., Lieberman, M. D., & Zaki, J. (2015). The emerging study of positive empathy. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9(2), 57-68.
https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12157
Nader-Grosbois, N., & Simon, P. (2023). Adaptation and Validation of a French Version of the Griffith Empathy Measure. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-023-10086-0
Neary, P. (2023). Questionnaire measures of empathy in children: A scoping review. Assessment, 30(3), 798-824.https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911211069677
Pang, Y., Song, C., & Ma, C. (2022). Effect of different types of empathy on prosocial behavior: Gratitude as mediator. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.768827
Park, Y. E., Yoon, H.-K., Kim, S. Y., Williamson, J., Wallraven, C., & Kang, J. (2019). A Preliminary Study for translation and validation of the korean version of the cognitive, affective, and somatic empathy scale in young adults. Psychiatry Investigation, 16(9), 671. doi: 10.30773/pi.2019.06.25
Preece, D., Becerra, R., Robinson, K., Dandy, J., & Allan, A. (2018). The psychometric assessment of alexithymia: Development and validation of the Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 132, 32-44 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.05.011
Raman, N., Ringold, S. M., Jayashankar, A., Butera, C. D., Kilroy, E., Harrison, L., ... & Aziz-Zadeh, L. (2023). Relationships between Affect Recognition, Empathy, Alexithymia, and Co-Occurring Conditions in Autism. Brain Sciences, 13(8), 1161.https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13081161
Raine, A., & Chen, F. R. (2018). The cognitive, affective, and somatic empathy scales (CASES) for children. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 47(1), 24-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2017.1295383
Raine, A., Chen, F. R., & Waller, R. (2022). The cognitive, affective and somatic empathy scales for adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 185, 111238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111238
Ritter, K., Dziobek, I., Preißler, S., Rüter, A., Vater, A., Fydrich, T., ... & Roepke, S. (2011). Lack of empathy in patients with narcissistic personality disorder. Psychiatry research, 187(1-2), 241-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2010.09.013
Schaffer, M., Clark, S., & Jeglic, E. L. (2009). The role of empathy and parenting style in the development of antisocial behaviors. Crime & Delinquency, 55(4), 586-599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128708321359
Sharafkhani, R., Nukpezah, R. N., Lathabhavan, R., Kallmen, H., Fournier, A., & Hosseini Marznaki, Z. (2023). Factors that affect levels of alexithymia, empathy and communication skills of nursing students in northern Iran. Nursing Open, 10, 3936-3945 DOI: 10.1002/nop2.1652
Spataro, P., Calabrò, M., & Longobardi, E. (2020). Prosocial behaviour mediates the relation between empathy and aggression in primary school children. European journal of developmental psychology, 17(5), 727-745.https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2020.1731467
Telle, N. T., & Pfister, H. R. (2016). Positive empathy and prosocial behavior: A neglected link. Emotion review, 8(2), 154-163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073915586817
Trobst, K. K., Collins, R. L., & Embree, J. M. (1994). The role of emotion in social support provision: Gender, empathy and expressions of distress. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11(1), 45-62.
Yin, Y., & Wang, Y. (2023). Is empathy associated with more prosocial behaviour? A meta‐analysis. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 26(1), 3-22.https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12537
Zaki, J., & Ochsner, K. N. (2012). The neuroscience of empathy: Progress, pitfalls and promise. Nature Neuroscience, 15(5), 675–680. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3085
Zarshghaee, M., Nori, A., & Oraizi, H. (2010). Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the balanced emotional empathy scale. Psychological Models and Methods, 1(1), 39-50.[in persian]