طراحی، ساخت و بررسی ویژگی‌های روا‌ن‌سنجی پرسشنامه ادراک استعاری درد در بیماران دارای بیماری مزمن فارسی‌زبان

نویسنده
موسسه آموزش عالی شناختی
چکیده
درد یکی از مفاهیم حوزه روان‌شناسی سلامت است که به‌دلیل ماهیت انتزاعی با استعاره‌های مفهومی یا شناختی بیان می‌شود. گویشوران فارسی زبان مانند زبان‌های دیگر از حوزه‌های مبدا و نگاشت‌های گوناگون برای بیان درد خود استفاده می‌کنند. ازاین‌رو، هدف از مطالعه حاضر طراحی، ساخت و بررسی ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی پرسشنامه ادراک استعاری درد در بیماران فارسی زبان دارای بیماری‌های مزمن است. روش پژوهش حاضر توصیفی از نوع زمینه‌یابی و مطالعات روان‌سنجی است. در ابتدا براساس تحلیل شناختی استعاره‌های درد رئیسی (2021)، نه نگاشت یا ارتباط استعاری استخراج شد که به‌ترتیب عبارت بودند از شیء، علیت، مسیر و جهت، انسان، مکان، مزه، ظرف، نیرو و دایره. بر اساس حوزه‌های مبدا به‌دست آمده، پرسشنامه‌ای دارای 25 سوال به‌شیوه مقیاس پاسخ‌دهی لیکرت ساخته شد. سه متخصص زبان‌شناسی شناختی، دو روان‌شناس سلامت، سه پزشک و دو متخصص روان‌سنجی، روایی محتوایی سؤالات را بررسی کردند. هیچ سوالی غیرمربوط یا نامناسب تشخیص داده نشد. سرانجام، پرسشنامه توسط 250 بیمار تک زبانه فارسی‌زبان دارای بیماری مزمن در سال 1401 به‌صورت دردسترس و داوطلبانه تکمیل شد. یافته‌ها نشان داد؛ کل پرسشنامه و عامل‌های آن با روش ضریب آلفای کرونباخ از اعتبار مطلوبی برخوردار است. همچنین، نتایج تحلیل عاملی نشان داد که پرسشنامه ادراک استعاری درد، از چهار عامل شیء، نیرو، انسان و علیت تشکیل شده که جمعاً 66/24 درصد از واریانس کل عامل‌ها را تبیین می‌کند. در نتیجه، پرسشنامه ادراک استعاری درد برای فارسی‌زبانان از روایی و اعتبار خوبی برخوردار است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Designing, Making and Evaluating Psychometric Characteristics of Pain Metaphorical Perception Questionnaire in Persian-Speaking Patients with Chronic Diseases

نویسنده English

Fatteme Raiisi
Cognitive science of language department
چکیده English

The purpose of this study was to design, make and evaluate the psychometric characteristics of a pain metaphorical perception questionnaire in Persian-speaking who suffer from chronic diseases. The method of this study was descriptive and psychometric and it was a survey type of research. At first, based on the cognitive analysis of Raiisi's pain metaphors (2021), nine metaphorical mappings were extracted, which were respectively object, causality, path and direction, human, place, taste, container, force, and circle. Based on obtained source domains, a questionnaire with 25 questions was created using a Likert response scale. The content validity of questions was evaluated by three cognitive linguistics experts, two health psychologists, three physicians, and two psychometric experts. No questions were found to be irrelevant or inappropriate. At last, the questionnaire was completed availability and voluntarily by 250 monolingual Persian-speaking patients with chronic diseases in 2022-2023. The results indicated that there was a reliability coefficient by using Cronbach's alpha for the whole questionnaire and its components. Moreover, the result of the factor analysis showed that this questionnaire consists of four factors including object, force, human, and causality, which explain 24.66% of the total variance of the factors. Consequently, the questionnaire on pain metaphorical perception has good validity and reliability for Persian speakers

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Psychometric Characteristics
Pain Metaphorical Perception Questionnaire
Chronic Diseases
Persian-Speaking Patients
1. Barke A, Korwisi B, Jakob R, Konstanjsek N, Rief W, Treede RD. Classification of chronic pain for the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11): results of the 2017 International World Health Organization field testing. PAIN, 2022;163(2):310-318, DOI:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002287.
2. Kosek E, Clauw D, Nijs J, Baron R, Gilron I, Harris R, Mico JA, Rice A, S M. Chronic nociplastic pain affecting the musculoskeletal system: clinical criteria and grading system. PAIN, 2021;162(11):2629-2634. DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002324
3. Jackson T, Thomas S, Stabile V, Shotwell M, Han X, McQueen K. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the global burden of chronic pain without clear etiology in low-and middle-income countries: trends in heterogeneous data and a proposal for new assessment methods. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 2016;123(3):739-48. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000001389
4. Walters CB, Kynes JM, Sobey J, Chimhundu-Sithole T, McQueen KAK. Chronic Pediatric Pain in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Children [Internet],2018;5(9):113. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children5090113.
5. Amini F, Raiisi F. The Relationship between Musculoskeletal Pain and Demographic Variables in Nursing and Midwifery Students. IJMPP, 2019;4(4):256-262. DOI:10.52547/ijmpp.4.4.256.
6. Raiisi F. The Relationships Between Pain Perception and Quality of Life in Addicts. IJMPP, 2020;5(2):350-356. DOI:10.52547/ijmpp.5.2.350.
7. Raiisi F, Amini F, Khani M. Investigating the Relationship Between Skeletal-Muscular Pains and Quality of Life among Nursing and Midwifery Students. IJMPP, 2020;5(2):336-343. DOI:10.52547/ijmpp.5.2.336.
8. Raiisi F, Reyhaninejad kafi Z, Rahmani R. Predicting Pain Anxiety Symptoms based on Pain Perception with the mediating role of Mental Pain in Musculoskeletal Patients. IJMPP,2022;7(2):702-707. DOI:10.52547/ijmpp.7.2.702.
9. Raiisi F, Raisi H, Kolivand M. Predicting Pain Catastrophizing based on Pain Anxiety Symptoms and Cognitive Flexibility in Cancer Patients. IJMPP,2022;7(3):772-777. DOI:10.52547/ijmpp.7.3.772.
10. Tehranizadeh M, Raiisi F. The Relationships between Depression, Self-Efficacy, Physical Disability and Chronic Pain. IJMPP,2020;5(3):373-379. DOI:10.52547/ijmpp.5.3.373.
11. Akbarian M, Saeidi N, Mafakheri M. Prediction of chronic pain components based on insecure attachment style, Mentalization and emotion regulation in patients with chronic pain. RPH, 2022;15(4):59-69. URL:http://rph.khu.ac.ir/article-1-4193-fa.html.
12. Meda RT, Nuguru SP, Rachakonda S, Sripathi S, Khan MI, Patelet N. Chronic Pain-Induced Depression: A Review of Prevalence and Management. Cureus,2022;14(8):e28416. DOI:10.7759/cureus.28416.
13. Raiisi F. Conceptual Metaphors of Pain in Persian: A Cognitive Analysis. IJMPP,2021;6(2):496-501. DOI:10.52547/ijmpp.6.2.496.
14. Lakoff G. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp.202–251). Cambridge University Press.1993. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013.
15. Lakoff G. Johnson M. Metaphors We Live By. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 2003.https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001.
16. Kövecses K. Metaphor universals in literature. Argumentum,2019;15:264-76. https://literary-universals.uconn.edu.
17. Kövecses Z. Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2020. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108859127
18. Kövecses Z. Meaning Making, Where Metaphors Come From: Reconsidering Context in Metaphor, Oxford Academic.2022. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190224868.003.0002.
19. García-Madariaga J, Moya I, Recuero N, Blasco MF. Revealing Unconscious Consumer Reactions to Advertisements That Include Visual Metaphors. A Neurophysiological Experiment. Frontiers in psychology, 2020;11,760. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00760.
20. Raiisi F, Afrashi A, Moghadasin M, HajiKaram A, Nematzadeh S. Understanding of metaphorical time pattern among medical and paramedical students. based on gender, age and academic status. SJKU, 2019;24(4):56-67.(In Persian). DOI:10.29252/sjku.24.4.56.
21. Raiisi F, Afrashi A, NematZadeh S, Moghadasin M. Conceptual Metaphors of time in Persian: A cognitive and Corpus-based Approach. Journal of Western Iranian Languages and Dialects,2020;8(1):15-29. (In Persian) DOI:10.22126/jlw.2020.1362.
22. Raiisi F, Riyassi M. Cognitive analysis of conceptual metaphors for depression from the perspective of clinical psychologists: A qualitative study. Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health, 2022;24(3):145-151. DOI:10.22038/JFMH.2022.20582.
23. Raiisi F, Ryassi M. Content Analysis of Eating Disorders Metaphorical Posts in Cyberspace. Journal of Cognitive Psychology,2023;10(3). (In Persian)URL:http://jcp.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3614-fa.html.
24. Raiisi F. Cognitive Analysis of Quality of Life Metaphors from the Perspective of Health Promotion Students. Health Education and Health Promotion,2022;10(2):233-238. URL:http://hehp.modares.ac.ir/article-5-55358-en.html.
25. Raiisi F, Riyassi M. Predicting the rate of procrastination of university students based on internet addiction and metaphorical perception of time during the Corona virus outbreak. Shenakht Journal of Psychology and Psychiatry,2022;9(1):73-83. (In Persian) DOI:10.32598/shenakht.9.1.73.
26. Semino L. Descriptions of Pain, Metaphor, and Embodied Simulation. Metaphor Symb,2010;25(4): 205-224. DOI:10.1080/10926488.2010.510926.
27. Raiisi F. Conceptual Metaphors of Pain in Persian: A Cognitive Analysis. IJMPP,2021;6(2):496-501. DOI:10.52547/ijmpp.6.2.496.
28. Raiisi F, Riyassi M. Understanding Cancer Patients' Lived Experience of Pain through Metaphors: A Qualitative Study. IJMPP,2022;7(3):759-764. DOI:10.52547/ijmpp.7.3.759.
29. Shafiei F, Ghassemzadeh H. Some reflections on representation and embodiment in cognitive psychology and cognitive science. Shenakht Journal of Psychology and Psychiatry, 2018;5(1):77-95. DOI:10.29252/shenakht.5.1.77.
30. Khosravi M, Sadighi S, Moradi S, Zendehdel K. Persian-McGill pain questionnaire translation, adaptation and reliability in cancer patients: a brief report. Tehran Univ Med J,2013;71(1):53-58.URL:http://tumj.tums.ac.ir/article-1-38-en.html.
31. Tanhaee Z, Fathi-Ashtiani A, Amini M, Vahedi H, Shaghaghi F. Validation of a Revised Version of the Short-form Mc-Gill PainQuestionnaire (SF-MPQ-2) for IBS Patients. Govaresh,2012;17:91-7.URL:http://www.govaresh.org/index.php/dd/article/view/921.
32. Mohammadzadeh A. The validation and reliability of measurements of the Centrality of Pain Scale (COPS) in patient with chronic pain disorders.JAP,2019;9(4):41-50. URL:http://jap.iums.ac.ir/article-1-5368-fa.html.
33. Raiisi F, Moghadasin M. Designing, Making and Evaluating Psychometric Characteristics of the Time Perception Pattern as Metaphorical Questionnaire Based on Cognitive- Dataset Analysis in Persians. JCP, 2020;8(2):70-87.URL:http://jcp.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3256-fa.html.
34. Fararoy J. Spectral dictionary (classification of the spectrum of Persian words). Tehran: Hermes publisher. 2021. ISSN:978-964-363-499-5.
35. Asparouhov T, Muthén B. Multiple Group Alignment for Exploratory and Structural Equation Models, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,2023;30(2):169-191. DOI:10.1080/10705511.2022.2127100
36. Savord A, McNeish D, Iida M, Quiroz S, & Ha T. Fitting the Longitudinal Actor-Partner Interdependence Model as a Dynamic Structural Equation Model in Mplus, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,2023;30(2):296-314. DOI:10.1080/10705511.2022.2065279
37. De Ridder D, Adhia D, Vanneste S. The anatomy of pain and suffering in the brain and its clinical implications. Neurosci Biobehav Rev,2021;130:125-146. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.08.013.
38. Yang S, Chang MC. Chronic Pain: Structural and Functional Changes in Brain Structures and Associated Negative Affective States. Int J Mol Sci,2019;20(13):3130. doi:10.3390/ijms20133130.
39. Raiisi F, Raisi H, Lak Chalespari G, Reyhani nejad Kafi Z. The Effectiveness of Compassion-focused Therapy on Pain Catastrophizing, and Resilience in Skeletal-Muscular Patients. IJMPP, 2023;8(2):887-894.URL:http://ijmpp.modares.ac.ir/article-32-68910-en.html
40. Raiisi F. Pain Metaphors as a Bridge between Physician and Patient: An Interdisciplinary Approach. IJMPP, 2023;8(2):862-863.URL:http://ijmpp.modares.ac.ir/article-32-67578-en.html