بررسی شیوع آزار سایبری و متغیرهای دموگرافیک آزارگران، آزاردیدگان و آزارگر-آزاردیده‌‌های سایبری

نویسندگان
محمدسعید اعظمی
فرهاد طارمیان
دانشگاه علوم بهزیستی و توانبخشی
10.52547/rph.14.4.19
چکیده
آزار سایبری به عنوان آسیب رسانی ارادی و مکرری که از طریق رایانه، تلفن همراه و سایر وسایل الکترونیکی اعمال می‌‌شود، تعریف شده است. در این پژوهش به بررسی شیوع این پدیده و توصیف متغیرهای دموگرافیک افراد مرتبط با آن پرداخته شده است. 425 نفر از دانش آموزان دختر و پسر دوره دوم دبیرستان شهر کرمانشاه به صورت تصادفی خوشه‌‌ای مورد بررسی قرار گرفتند. از این بین 2/53 درصد مونث (226 نفر) و 8/46 درصد نیز مذکر بودند (199 نفر). در دو ماه گذشته شیوع آزارگری سایبری 7/7 درصد، آزاردیدگی سایبری 9/10 درصد، آزارگری-آزاردیدگی سایبری 4/31 درصد بوده و 0/50 درصد نیز با این پدیده درگیر نبوده‌‌اند. بررسی متغیرهای دموگرافیک نیز نشان داد 54 درصد پسران و 46 درصد دختران با آزار سایبری درگیر بوده‌‌اند، همچنین افراد مرتبط با آزار سایبری اعتقادات مذهبی خانوادگی ضعیف‌‌تر و رابطه با والدین بدتری را گزارش کردند، ساعات استفاده روزانه‌‌شان از اینترنت بیشتر بوده و بیشترین فعالیتی که در اینترنت دارند در شبکه‌‌های اجتماعی است. نتایج بررسی سایر متغیرهای دموگرافیک نیز در جداول ارائه شده است. شیوع آزارگری و آزاردیدگی سایبری در حد سایر کشورها بوده اما آزارگری-آزاردیدگی سایبری نسبت به نتایج اعلام شده در سایر دنیا شیوع بیشتری دارد. همچنین نتایج برخی متغیرهای دموگرافیک تفاوت‌‌های قابل ملاحظه‌‌ای را نشان داد که باید در آینده مورد پژوهش‌‌های بیشتری قرار بگیرند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
آزار سایبری
آزارگر سایبری
آزاردیده سایبری
آزارگر-آزاردیده سایبری
شیوع
متغیرهای دموگرافیک
دانش‌آموزان

عنوان مقاله English

The prevalence of Cyberbullying and demographic characteristics of bullies, victims and cyber bullies-victims

نویسندگان English

Mohammad saeed Azami
Farhad Taremian
University of social welfare and rehabilitation sciences
چکیده English

Cyberbullying is defined as a willful and repeated harm, inflicted through computer, cell phones and other electronic devices. In this article, the prevalence of cyberbullying and demographic characteristic of the people who were involved in this phenomenon, has been studied. 425 boys and girls in Kermanshah’s high school had been selected using randomized cluster procedure. The prevalence of cyberbullying was 7.7 percent, cybervictimization was 10.9 percent, and cyberbully-victim was 31.4 percent and 50.0 percent of the students weren’t involved. The result of demographic characteristics showed that more than half of boys and less than half of girls were involved in cyberbullying. Students who were involved in cyberbullying, had weaker religious beliefs in family and reported worse parent-child relationships. They also had more daily internet use and using social network is what they do the most on the internet. Results of other demographic characteristic is shown in their own tables. The prevalence of cyberbullying and cybervictimization is aligned with other countries but cyberbully-victims’ rates are higher. Results of some of the demographic characteristics showed pretty interesting differences that must be considered in future studies.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

cyberbullying
Cyberbully
Cybervictim
Cyberbully-victim Prevalence
Demographic characteristic
Students
Salmon S, Turner S, Taillieu T, Fortier J, Afifi TO. Bullying victimization experiences among middle and high school adolescents: Traditional bullying, discriminatory harassment, and cybervictimization. J Adolesc. 2018; 63:29-40.
Hendricks EA, Tanga PT. Effects of bullying on the psychological functioning of victims. Southern African Journal of Social Work and Social Development. 2019; 31(1):1-17.
Patchin JW, Hinduja S. Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: A preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth violence and juvenile justice. 2006; 4(2):148-69.
Mishna F, Cook C, Gadalla T, Daciuk J, Solomon S. Cyber bullying behaviors among middle and high school students. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2010; 80(3):362-74.
Lee C, Shin N. Prevalence of cyberbullying and predictors of cyberbullying perpetration among Korean adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior. 2017; 68:352-8.
Kowalski RM, Limber SP, McCord A. A developmental approach to cyberbullying: Prevalence and protective factors. Aggression and Violent Behavior. 2019 Mar 1;45:20-32.
Mishna F, Khoury-Kassabri M, Gadalla T, Daciuk J. Risk factors for involvement in cyber bullying: Victims, bullies and bully–victims. Children and Youth Services Review. 2012;34(1):63-70.
Savoldi F, Ferraz de Abreu P. Bullying, cyberbullying and Internet usage among young people in post-conflict Belfast. Cogent Social Sciences. 2016;2(1):1132985.
Juvonen J, Gross EF. Extending the school grounds?--Bullying experiences in cyberspace. J Sch Health. 2008;78(9):496-505.
Solomontos-Kountouri O, Tsagkaridis K, Gradinger P, Strohmeier D, Trip S. Academic, Socio-emotional and Demographic Characteristics of Adolescents Involved in Traditional Bullying, Cyberbullying, or Both: Looking at Variables and Persons. International Journal of Developmental Science. 2017;11(1-2):19-30.
Özdemir Y. Cyber victimization and adolescent self‐esteem: The role of communication with parents. Asian Journal of Social Psychology. 2014;17(4):255-63.
Li J, Sidibe AM, Shen X, Hesketh T. Incidence, risk factors and psychosomatic symptoms for traditional bullying and cyberbullying in Chinese adolescents. Children and Youth Services Review. 2019 Dec 1;107:104511.
Martínez-Monteagudo MC, Delgado B, Díaz-Herrero Á, García-Fernández JM. Relationship between suicidal thinking, anxiety, depression and stress in university students who are victims of cyberbullying. Psychiatry Research. 2020;286:112856.
Trompeter N, Bussey K, Fitzpatrick S. Cyber victimization and internalizing difficulties: the mediating roles of coping self-efficacy and emotion dysregulation. Journal of abnormal child psychology. 2017:1-11.
Goebert D, Else I, Matsu C, Chung-Do J, Chang JY. The impact of cyberbullying on substance use and mental health in a multiethnic sample. Maternal and child health journal. 2011;15(8):1282-6.
Jadambaa A, Thomas HJ, Scott JG, Graves N, Brain D, Pacella R. Prevalence of traditional bullying and cyberbullying among children and adolescents in Australia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 2019; 53(9):878-88.
Aboujaoude E, Savage MW, Starcevic V, Salame WO. Cyberbullying: Review of an Old Problem Gone Viral. J Adolesc Health. 2015; 57(1):10-8.
Arabshahi F, Fakhri A, Serami M, Ketabi M, Golestaneh Z, Akbari H, et al. An investigation of the bullying through social networks among junior high school students: an experience in
Kashan, Iran. International journal of school health. 2018; 5(1).
Rice E, Petering R, Rhoades H, Winetrobe H, Goldbach J, Plant A, et al. Cyberbullying perpetration and victimization among middle-school students. American Journal of Public Health. 2015;105(3):e66-e72.
Wang P, Wang X, Lei L. Gender Differences Between Student–Student Relationship and Cyberbullying Perpetration: An Evolutionary Perspective. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2021;36(19-20):9187-9207.
Baldry AC, Farrington DP, Sorrentino A. “Am I at risk of cyberbullying”? A narrative review and conceptual framework for research on risk of cyberbullying and cybervictimization: The risk and needs assessment approach. Aggression and Violent Behavior. 2015;23:36-51.
Huang Y-y, Chou C. An analysis of multiple factors of cyberbullying among junior high school students in Taiwan. Computers in Human Behavior. 2010;26(6):1581-90.
Álvarez-García D, Pérez JCN, González AD, Pérez CR. Risk factors associated with cybervictimization in adolescence. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology. 2015;15(3):226-35.
Festl R, Scharkow M, Quandt T. Peer Influence, Internet use and Cyberbullying: A Comparison of Different Context Effects among German Adolescents. Journal of Children and Media. 2013;7(4):446-62.
Tsimtsiou Z, Haidich A-B, Drontsos A, Dantsi F, Sekeri Z, Drosos E, et al. Pathological Internet use, cyberbullying and mobile phone use in adolescence: a school-based study in Greece. International journal of adolescent medicine and health. 2018;30(6).
Sticca F, Ruggieri S, Alsaker F, Perren S. Longitudinal risk factors for cyberbullying in adolescence. Journal of community & applied social psychology. 2013;23(1):52-67.
Mobin A, Feng CX, Neudorf C. Cybervictimization among preadolescents in a community-based sample in Canada: Prevalence and predictors. Canadian journal of public health. 2017;108(5-6):e475-e81.
Arıcak, O. T. (2009). Psychiatric symptomatology as a predictor of cyberbullying among university students. Egitim Arastirmalari-Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 34, 167-184.
Zsila Á, Urbán R, Griffiths MD, Demetrovics Z. Gender differences in the association between cyberbullying victimization and perpetration: The role of anger rumination and traditional bullying experiences. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. 2018:1-16.
Agatston PW, Kowalski R, Limber S. Students’ perspectives on cyber bullying. Jou‌rnal of Adolescent Health. 2007;41(6):S59-S60.
Yang S-J, Stewart R, Kim J-M, Kim S-W, Shin I-S, Dewey ME, et al. Differences in predictors of traditional and cyber-bullying: a 2-year longitudinal study in Korean school children. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 2013;22(5):309-18.
Schumann L, Craig W, Rosu A. Power differentials in bullying: Individuals in a community context. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2014;29(5):846-65.
Agnew R, White HR. An empirical test of general strain theory. Criminology. 1992;30(4):475-500.
Marret MJ, Choo WY. Factors associated with online victimisation among Malaysian adolescents who use social networking sites: a cross-sectional study. BMJ open. 2017;7(6):e014959.
Kowalski RM, Limber SP. Psychological, physical, and academic correlates of cyberbullying and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2013;53(1):S13-S20.
Perren S, Dooley J, Shaw T, Cross D. Bullying in school and cyberspace: Associations with depressive symptoms in Swiss and Australian adolescents. Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health. 2010;4(1):28.
Lam LT, Li Y. The validation of the E-Victimisation Scale (E-VS) and the E-Bullying Scale (E-BS) for adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior. 2013;29(1):3-7.
Lam LT, Cheng Z, Liu X. Violent online games exposure and cyberbullying/victimization among adolescents. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 2013;16(3):159-65.
Sourander A, Brunstein Klomek A, Ikonen M, Lindroos J, Luntamo T, Koskelainen M, et al. Psychosocial risk factors associated with cyberbullying among adolescents: a population-based study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010;67(7):720-8.