نقش میانجی روابط موضوعی و کارکردهای ایگو در رابطه بین عملکرد خانواده و سلامت روان دانشجویان

نویسندگان
گروه روانشناسی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه خیام.
چکیده
عملکرد خانواده به عنوان یک عامل مؤثر بر سلامت روان شناخته شده است. هدف پژوهش پیش روی بررسی نقش میانجی روابط موضوعی و کارکردهای ایگو در رابطه بین عملکرد خانواده و سلامت روان دانشجویان در چارچوب نظریه روابط موضوعی بود. در این پژوهش توصیفی از نوع همبستگی، جامعه آماری دانشجویان دانشگاه خیام بودند که نمونه­ای 300 نفری (195 دختر و 105 پسر) به روش نمونه‌گیری خوشه‌ای چند مرحله‌ای انتخاب شدند. به منظور جمع آوری اطلاعات از پرسشنامه سلامت عمومی، ابزار سنجش خانواده، پرسشنامه روابط موضوعی بل و پرسشنامه سبک‌های دفاعی استفاده شد. ارزیابی الگوی پیشنهادی با استفاده از روش تحلیل مسیر انجام گرفت. شاخص‌های برازش مدل بیانگر این بود که روابط موضوعی و مکانیسم‌های رشد یافته ایگو، نقش میانجی در رابطه بین عملکرد خانواده و سلامت روان دارند. اما مکانیسم‌های رشد نایافته و نوروتیک ایگو نقش میانجی نداشتند. نتایج به دست آمده نشان داد که همسو با نظریه روابط موضوعی، عملکرد خانواده با تأثیرگذاری بر روابط موضوعی و مکانیسم های دفاعی، منجر به افزایش سلامت روان می شود.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Mediating Role of the Object Relations and the Ego Function in Relation between Family Function and Mental Health in Student

نویسندگان English

Maryam Shafaghdoost
Fatemeh Shahamat Dehsorkh
Faculty of humanities, Khayyam University, Mashhad, Iran,
چکیده English

This study has aimed to investigate the mediating role of the object relations and defense mechanisms in relation between family function and percived mental health. relations. General health questioner, family assessment device, Bell's object relation inventory and defense style questionnaire were administrated on a sample of 300 students (195 girls and 105 boys). Participants were selected, using multi-stage cluster sampling, from Khayyam University. Data were studied through path analysis method. Results indicated that object relations and mature defense mechanisms of ego played a mediating role in relation between family function and mental health. However, the immature and neurotic mechanisms of ego did not have a mediating role. Being compatible with object relation theory, this research revealed that family functions enhance mental health through affecting object relation and defense mechanisms.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

mental health
family function
Object Relations
Ego Functions
defense mechanisms
1. Robinson P, Turk D, Jilka S, Cella M. Measuring attitudes towards mental health using social media: investigating stigma and trivialisation. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2019;54(1):51–8.
2. Roe D, Corrigan P, Link B. Mental Health Stigma: So much progress and yet a long way to go - Introduction to special issue on stigma. Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 2017;54(1):3–5.
3. Tong G. World Mental Health Day 2018, but how aware are medical students? Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019;10:217-9.
4. Molavi P, Mohammadi MR, KHaleghi A, Mohammadi N, Moghadam M. Prevalence of Psychiatric Disorders in Children and Adolescents in Ardabil Province: A Population-Based Study. J Ardabil Univ Med Sci. 2018;18(2):240–51. [Persian].
5. Ghasemi F, Ebrahimi A, Samouei R. A Review of Mental Health Indicators in National Studies. J Isfahan Med Sch. 2018;36(470):209–15. [Persian].
6. Parke R, Ladd G. Family-peer relationships: Modes of linkage. Routledge; 2016.
7. Katz-Wise S, Ehrensaft D, Vetters R, Forcier M, Austin B. Family Functioning and Mental Health of Transgender and Gender-Nonconforming Youth in the Trans Teen and Family Narratives Project. J Sex Res. 2018;55(4–5):582–90.
8. D’Onofrio B, Emery R. Parental divorce or separation and children’s mental health. World Psychiatry. 2019;18(1):100–1.
9. Sexton TL. Functional Family Therapy. Encycl Juv Delinq Justice. 2017;1–7.
10. Sharifi F, Amiri S, Ghasemi V. Predicting adolescents’ moral identity from family function. J Psychol Achiev. 2018;25(1):45–58. [Persian].
11. Farshad M, Najarpourian S, Salmabadi M. Prediction of Family Function Based on Couples’ Communication Patterns and Perceived Social Support in Nurses of Hormozgan University of Medical. Iran J Psychiatr Nurs. 2018;6(1):18–24. [Persian].
12. Reardon T, Harvey K, Baranowska M, O’Brien D, Smith L, Creswell C. What do parents perceive are the barriers and facilitators to accessing psychological treatment for mental health problems in children and adolescents? A systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017;26(6):623–47.
13. Persson P, Rossin-Slater M. Family Ruptures, Stress, and the Mental Health of the Next Generation. Am Econ Rev. 2018 Apr;108(4–5):1214–52.
14. Alpert J. Object Relations Theory. Am J Psychiatry. 2014;147(7):961--962.
15. Rinkinen J, Jalas M, Shove E. Object Relations in Accounts of Everyday Life. Sociology. 2015;49(5):870–85.
16. Hadinezhad H, Tabatabaeian M, Dehghani M, Inventory RT. ‌‌‌‌‌A Preliminary Study for Validity and Reliability of Bell Object Relations and Reality Testing Inventory. Iran J Psychiatry Clin Psychol. 2014;20(2):162–9. [Persian].
17. Kernberg OF. Neurobiological correlates of object relations theory. the relationship between neurobiological and psychodynamic development. Int Forum Psychoanal (2015) 24(1):38–46. 10.1080/0803706X.2014.912352
18. Fuchshuber J, Hiebler-Ragger M, Kresse A, Kapfhammer H-P, Unterrainer HF. The Influence of Attachment Styles and Personality Organization on Emotional Functioning After Childhood Trauma. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2019;10(643).
19. Kealy D, Ogrodniczuk JS, Howell-Jones G. Object relations and emotional processing deficits among psychiatric outpatients. The Journal of nervous and mental disease. 2011;199(2):132-5.
20. Gubb K. Psychosomatics today: a review of contemporary theory and practice. Psychoanalytic review. 2013;100(1):103-42.21.
21.Chamani F, Najafi M. The Relationship between Object Relations and Early Maladaptive Schemas with Borderline Personality Syndrome among the Students of Medical Sciences. J Res Behav Sci. 2018;16(1):54–61. [Persian].
22. Scharff J. Psychoanalysis online: Mental health, teletherapy, and training. Karnac Books; 2013.
23. Zarei AR, Haghayegh SA. The predict of psychological well-being based on defense mechanisms and adaptation strategies in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. J Health Psychol. 2016;5(20):137–51. [Persian].
24. Summers F. Object relations theories and psychopathology: A comprehensive text. Routledge; 2014.
25. Jamil L, Atef Vahid M, Dehghani M, Habibi M. The mental health through psychodynamic perspective: The relationship between the ego strength, the defense styles, and the object relations to mental health. Iran J Psychiatry Clin Psychol. 1394;21(2):144–54. [Persian].
26. Vaillant GE. Theoretical hierarchy of adaptive ego mechanisms: a 30-year follow-up of 30 men selected for psychological health. Archives of general psychiatry. 1971;24(2):107-18.
27. Granieri A, La Marca L, Mannino G, Giunta S, Guglielmucci F, Schimmenti A. The Relationship between Defense Patterns and DSM-5 Maladaptive Personality Domains. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1926-.
28. Larsen A, Boggild H, Mortensen JT, Foldager L, Hansen J, Christensen A, et al. Psychopathology, defence mechanisms, and the psychosocial work environment. The International journal of social psychiatry. 2010;56(6):563-77.29.
29. Drapeau M, Thompson K, Petraglia J, Thygesen KL, Lecours S. Defense mechanisms and gender: An examination of two models of defensive functioning derived from the defense style questionnaire. Int J Psychol Psychol Ther. 2011;11(1):149–55.
30. Ranjbari T, Besharat MA, Pourhossein R. The Mediating Role of Procrastination in the Relationship between Perfectionism Pathologies and Depression/Anxiety Symptoms. J Dev Psychol Iran Psychol. 2017;14(53):15–27. [Persian].
31. Besharat MA, Ramesh S, Moghimi E. Spiritual health mediates the relationship between ego-strength and adjustment to heart disease. Heal Psychol Open. 2018;5(1):28–36.
32. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications; 2015.
33. Sterling M. General health questionnaire–28 (GHQ-28). J Physiother. 2011;1(57):259–67.
34. Taghavi M. The validity and reliability of General Health Questionnaire (G.H.Q). J Psychol. 2001;5(4):381–98. [Persian].
35. Soorani R. The role of spiritual intelligence in the social: Impact of spiritual intelligence on mental health in public high school teachers. jiera. 2018;12(Special Issue):1201–11. [Persian].
36. Zadeh Mohammadi A, Malek Khosravi G. Preliminary Study of Psychometric Properties and Validation of a Scale to assess family functioning. J Fam Res. 2006;2(5):69–89. [Persian].
37. YOOSEFI N. An investigation of the psychometric properties of the mcmaster clinical rating scale (MCRS). Educ Meas. 2012;2(7):91–20. [Persian].
38. Bell M, Billington R, Becker B. A scale for the assessment of object relations: Reliability, validity, and factorial invariance. J Clin Psychol. 1986;42(5):733–41.
39. Andrews G, Singh M, Bond M. The Defense Style Questionnaire. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1993;181(4):246–56.
40. Heydarinasab L. Comparing defense mechanisms in clinical and non-clinical samples according to psychometric results of Persian Defense Mechanisms Questionnaire. Tehran: Tarbiat Modares University; 2006. [Persian].
41. Sangalang CC, Jager J, Harachi T. Effects of maternal traumatic distress on family functioning and child mental health: An examination of Southeast Asian refugee families in the U.S. Soc Sci Med. 2017;184:178–86.
42. Lindblom J, Punamäki R-L, Flykt M, Vänskä M, Nummi T, Sinkkonen J, et al. Early Family Relationships Predict Children’s Emotion Regulation and Defense Mechanisms. SAGE Open. 2016;6(4):215824401668139.
43. Nelson SM, Lengu K, Albright J, Huprich SK, Paggeot A. Object relations predicts borderline personality disorder symptoms beyond emotional dysregulation, negative affect, and impulsivity. Personal Disord Theory, Res Treat. 2016;8(1):46–53.
44. Diamond D. Attachment Research and Psychoanalysis. Attachment Research and Psychoanalysis. Routledge; 2018.