بررسی نقش ویژگی‌های شخصیت مرزی و حساسیت به طرد در پیش‌بینی عضویت در شبکه‌های اجتماعی

نویسندگان
محمد رضا لطفی
قاسم آهی
ایمان صفایی
دانشگاه آزاد بیرجند
10.52547/rph.11.4.31
چکیده
امروزه از اینترنت و شبکه‌های اجتماعی استفاده‌های فراوان و بعضاً بیمارگونی می‌شود؛‌ لذا این پژوهش با هدف بررسی نقش ویژگی‌های شخصیت مرزی و حساسیت به طرد در پیش‌بینی عضویت در شبکه‌های اجتماعی انجام شد. در یک پژوهش توصیفی از نوع همبستگی، از بین دبیران مقطع متوسطۀ شهرستان خوسف استان خراسان جنوبی که تعداد آن‌ها 200 نفر، (111 نفر زن، 89 نفر مرد) بود با روش سرشماری، 182 نفر انتخاب شدند که با مقیاس شخصیت مرزی، پرسش‌نامۀ حساسیت به طرد و پرسش‌نامه شبکه‌های اجتماعی پاسخ دادند. برای آزمون فرضیه‌های پژوهش از ضریب همبستگی پیرسون و تحلیل رگرسیون چندمتغیره استفاده شد. یافته‌ها نشان داد که حساسیت به طرد و ویژگی‌های شخصیت مرزی، در پیش‌بینی عضویت در شبکه‌های اجتماعی نقش دارد و این دو متغیر 27درصد از واریانس عضویت در شبکه‌های اجتماعی را تبیین می‌نمایند. به نظر می‌رسد داشتن ویژگی شخصیت مرزی و حساسیت به طرد در روابط بین فردی واقعی از عوامل اثرگذار در گرایش به استفاده بیشتر و اجبارگونه از شبکه های اجتماعی است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
ویژگی‌های شخصیت مرزی
حساسیت به طرد
شبکه‌های اجتماعی

عنوان مقاله English

The Role of Borderline Personality Traits and Rejection Sensitivity in Prediction of Membership in Social Networks

نویسندگان English

Mohammad reza Lotfi
Qasem Ahi
Iman Safayi
Islamic Azad University, Birjand, Iran
چکیده English

Nowadays, the Internet and social networks are used extensively and sometimes pathologically. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the role of borderline personality traits and rejection sensitive in predicting membership in social networks. In this descriptive and correlational study, among 200 high school teachers (111 females and 89 male) of Khusfe city, South Khorasan province, 182 teachers were selected by census method and then they were asked to complete borderline personality scale, rejection sensitive questionnaire and a questionnaire on membership in social networks. To test the hypotheses, Pearson correlation coefficient and multivariate regression analysis were used. Results showed that rejection sensitivity and borderline personality traits had a role in predicting membership in social networks and these two variables accounted for 27% variance of membership in social networks. It seems that having borderline personality traits and rejection sensitivity in actual interpersonal relations are effective factors in a tendency to use social networks more and compulsorily.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

borderline personality traits
rejection sensitivity
Social networks
1. Finkel EJ, Eastwick PW, Karney BR, Reis HT, Sprecher S. Online dating: A critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 2012; 13(1): 3-66.
2. Saberipour B, Mousavi SA, Ghanavati R, Ziagham S. Effects of virtual Social Network on sleep Disorders of the Students of Shushtar City in 2015. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies. 2016;12, 638-648.
4. Ravhuhali F, Baloyi MS, Mutshaeni HN, Mashau TS. The Prevalence of Social Networking among Grade 10 Learners: Are There Any Academic Benefits?, Journal of Communication. 2015; 6(2); 275-283.
5. Guedes E, Sancassiani F, Carta MG, Campos C, Machado S, King LA, Nardi AE. Internet Addiction and Excessive Social Networks Use: What About Facebook? Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health. 2016; 28(12): 43-48.
6. Correa T, Hinsley AW, Zuniga HG. Who interacts on the web? The intersection of users’ personality and social media use. Computers in Human Behavior. 2010; 26, 247-253.
7. Baltzidis E, Kokkinos CM. Prevalence and personality correlates of Facebook bullying among university students. 2017; Conference: World Anti-Bullying forum, At Stockholm, Sweden.
8. Afrasibi, MS. Social Networks Contracts for make People information accessible. Communication management. 2015; 81, 29-31
9. Delshadi Z, Delshadi M, Shafiiyan Z, Mansooriyan M. Survey of social networking usage and its relationship with the study status of students of Ilam universities 2015. Rahavard Salamat Journal. 2015; 2 (2): 41-49.
10. Bagheri, Hasan, Bahadori Jahromi, Samina. Investigating the Impact of Telegram Social Network on Users' Social Changes. Journal of Social Science Studies. 2016; 2(4): 37-44.
11. Blackhart GC, Fitzpatrick J, Williamson J. Dispositional factors predicting use of online dating sites and behaviors related to online dating. Computers in Human Behavior. 2014; 33, 113–118.
13. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
14. Keng SH, Tan HU. Effects of brief mindfulness and loving-kindness meditation inductions on emotional and behavioral responses to social rejection among individuals with high borderline personality traits, Behaviour Research and Therapy. 2017; 100,44-53.
15. Baryshnikov L, Aaltonen K, Suvisaari J, Koivisto M, Heikkinen M, Joffe G., Isometsa E. Features of borderline personality disorder as a mediator of the relation between childhood traumatic experiences and psychosis-like experiences in patients with mood disorder. European Psychiatry. 2018; (17(49): 9–
16. Lazarus, SA, Cheavens JS. An Examination of Social Network Quality and Composition in Women With and Without Borderline Personality Disorder. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment. 2017; 8(4):340-348.
17. Hopwood CJ, Wright AG, Ansell EB, Pincus AL. The interpersonal core of personality pathology. Journal of Personality Disorders. 2013; 27(3): 270–295.
18. Stepp SD, Keenan K, Hipwell AE, Krueger RF. The impact of childhood temperament on the development of borderline personality disorder symptoms over the course of adolescence. Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation. 2014; 1(18): 1-10.
19. Mosquera D, Steele K. Complex trauma, dissociation and Borderline Personality Disorder: Working with integration failures. European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation. 2017; 1(1): 63–71.
20. Have MT, Verheul R, Kaasenbrood A, Dorsselaer S, Tuithof M, Kleinjan M, Graaf RD. Prevalence rates of borderline personality disorder symptoms: a study based on the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study-2. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;16(249):1-10.
21. Tomko RL, Trull TJ, Wood PK, Sher KJ. Characteristics of borderline personality disorder in a community sample: comorbidity, treatment utilization, and general functioning. J Personal Disord. 2014; 28,734–750.
22. Calvo N, Valero S, Arntz A, Andion O, Matali Jl, Navascues V. Validation of the Spanish version of the Borderline Personality Disorder Checklist (BPD Checklist) in a sample of BPD patients: Study of psychometric properties. The European Journal of Psychiatry. 2017; 32(1): 26-35.
23. Saffar M. The relationship between borderline personality features and depression: The mediating role of rumination. Master's thesis for Educational Sciences. Islamic Azad niversity Birjand Branch; 2015.
24. Stepp SD, Pilkonis PA, Yaggi KE, Morse JQ, Feske U. Interpersonal and emotional experiences of social interactions in borderline personality disorder. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 2009; 197, 484-491.
25. Zielinski MJ, Veilleux JC. Examining the relation between borderline personality features and social support: The mediating role of rejection sensitivity. Personality and Individual Differences. 2014; 70, 235-238.
26. Liebke L, Bungert M, Thome J, Hauschild S, Gescher DM, Schmahl C, Bohus M, Lis S. Loneliness, Social Networks, and Social Functioning in Borderline Personality Disorder. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment. 2016; 8(4):349-356.
27. Clifton A, Pilkonis PA, McCarty Ch. Social networks in borderline personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders. 2007; 21(4): 434–441.
28. Ross C, Orr ES, Sisic M, Arseneault JM, Simmering, MG, Orr RR. Personality and motivation associated with Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior. 2009; 25, 5578-5586.
29. Hamburger YA, Ben-Artzi E. The relationship between extraversion and neuroticism and the different uses of the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior. 2000; 16, 441-449.
30. Watson J, Nesdale D. Rejection sensitivity, social withdrawal, and loneliness in young adults. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 2012; 42, 1984-2005.
31. Brookings JB, Zembar MJ, Hochstetler GM. An interpersonal circumplex/five-factor analysis of the Rejection Sensitivity Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences. 2003; 34, 449-461.
32. Romero-Canyas R., Downey G, Berenson K, Ayduk O, Kang NJ. Rejection sensitivity and the rejection-hostility link in romantic relationships. Journal of Personality. 2010; 78(1):119-148.
33. Miano A, Fertuck EA, Arntz A, Stanley B. Rejection sensitivity is a mediator between borderline personality disorder features and facial trust appraisal. Journal of Personality Disorders. 2013; 27, 442-456.
34. King-Casas B, Chiu PH. Understanding interpersonal function in psychiatric illness through multiplayer economic games. Biological Psychiatry. 2012; 72(2): 119-125.
35. Mohseni M, Doran B, Sohrabi MH. Examining the effects of using internet on social isolation of internet users. J Iranian sociology. 2005; 8,72-95.
36. Farahani HA, Aghamohamadi S, Kazemi Z, Bakhtiarvand F, Ansari M. Examining the relationship between sensitivity to rejection and using Facebook in university students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2011; 28,807-810.
37. Yaryari F, Dehghan M, Hosseini A. Comparison of Loneliness, Emotion Regulation and Body Image Satisfaction in Virtual Social Network Users Based on Gender. rph. 2015; 9(3):34-42
38. Salimi A, Jokar B, Nikpur R. Internet communications in life: Examining the role of social support and feeling of loneliness in using Internet. Psychological Studies. 2009; 5(3): 81-102.
39. Flad K.The Influence of Social Networking Participation on Student Academic Performance across Gender Lines. Counselor Education Master’s Theses. The College at Brockport. New York: State University of New York; 2010.
40. Tarawneh HA. The Influence of Social Networks on Students’ Performance. Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences. 2014; 5(4): 200-205.
41. Ganji H. Mental Health. Arasbaran Publication, Tehran; 2007.
42.Fonseca-Pedrero E, Muniz J, Lemos-Giraldez S, Garcia-Cueto E, Campillo-Alvarez A, Garcia UV. Multidimentionality of schizotypy under review. Papeles del Psicologo. 2007; 28, 117-126.
43. Kim Y, Lee Z., Gosian S. Impediment to successful ERP implementation process, Business process Management journal. 2005; 11(2): 158-170.
44. Rawlings D, Claridge G, Freeman JL. Principal components analysis of the Schizotypal Personality Scale (STA) and the Borderline Personality Scale (STB). Personality and Individual Differences. 2001; 31, 409-419.
45. Mohammadzadeh A, Goodarzi MA, Taghavi MR, Mollazadeh M. The study of factor structure, validity, reliability and standardization of borderline personality scale in Shiraz university students. Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health. 2005; 27,75-89.
46. Downey G, Feldman SI. Implications of rejection sensitivity for intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1996; 70, 1327–1343.
47. Staebler K, Helbing E, Rosenbach C, Renneberg B. Rejection sensitivity and borderline personality disorder. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy. 2011; 18(4): 275-283.
48. Eraslan-Capan B. Interpersonal Sensitivity and Problematic Facebook Use in Turkish University Students. Anthropologist. 2015; 21(3): 395-403.
49. Mikaeili N, Habibi, Y. Design and Test of Causal Model for Relation between Internet Addiction and Emotional Self-Regulation, Rejection Sensitivity and Online Self-Disclosure with Mediation of Social Anxiety in Students. Culture in The Islamic University. 2016; 6(20): 395-418.
50. Sheldon P. The relationship between unwillingness-to-communicate and students’ Facebook use. Journal of Media Psychology. 2008; 20, 67–75.
51. Lee ZY, Cheung CM. Problematic use of social networking sites: The role of self-esteem. International Journal of Business and Information. 2014; 9,143-159.
52. Valkenburg PM, Schouten AP, Peter J. Adolescents’ identity experiments on the Internet. New Media and Society. 2005; 7, 383-402.
53. Ryan T, Xenos S. Who uses Facebook? An investigation into the relationship between the Big Five, shyness, narcissism, loneliness, and Facebook usage, Computers in Human Behavior. 2011; 27, 1658-1664.
54. Good A, Sambhanthan A, Panjganj V, Spettigue S. Computer Interaction and the Benefits of Social Networking for People with Borderline Personality Disorder: Enlightening Mental Health Professionals. international Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. HCI International 2011 – Posters’ Extended Abstracts; 2011.
55. Lazarus SA, Southward MW, Cheavens JS. Do borderline personality disorder features and rejection sensitivity predict social network outcomes over time? Personality and Individual Differences. 2016; 22, 232-239.
56. Kuhlken K, Robertson C, Benson J, Nelson-Gray R. The interaction of borderline personality disorder symptoms and relationship satisfaction in predicting affect. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment. 2013; 5, 20–25.