رابطه رفتار زورگویی با عوامل خانوادگی، فردی و آموزشگاهی در دانش آموزان

نویسندگان
فرشاد محسن زاده 1
مختار عارفی 2
شکوه افطاری 1
1 دانشگاه خوارزمی
2 دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد کرمانشاه
10.18869/acadpub.rph.9.2.54
چکیده
هدف این پژوهش بررسی میزان شیوع زورگوئی در بین دانش آموزان و رابطه آن با متغیرهای کیفیت فضای خانواده، تکانش گری، افسردگی، باورهای حامی رفتار خشن و نگرش به مدرسه بود. نمونه شامل 344 دانش آموز دوره راهنمایی تحصیلی(205 دختر و 139 پسر) شهر کرمانشاه بود که به روش نمونه گیری خوشه ای چند مرحله ای انتخاب و مورد مطالعه قرار گرفتند. داده های بدست آمده با استفاده از روشهای آمار توصیفی و نیز تحلیل رگرسیون گام به گام مورد بررسی قرار گرفتند. نتایج نشان داد که اشکال گوناگون رفتار زورگویانه در بین 7/13 تا 1/52 درصد پسران و بین 2/10 تا 6/46 درصد دختران اتفاق می افتد که در هر دو جنس بیشترین میزان رفتار زورگویانه گزارش شده: صدا زدن با اسامی زشت و زننده و تمسخر آزاردهنده، و کمترین میزان رفتار زورگویانه گزارش شده، برداشتن پول یا وسایل و آسیب زدن به آنها بود. یافته ها نشان داد در دختران بین همه متغیرهای پیش بین با رفتار زورگویانه رابطه معناداری وجود دارد، اما در پسران فقط سه متغیر کیفیت فضای خانواده، افسردگی، و تکانش گری با رفتار زورگویانه رابطه معناداری داشتند. تحلیل رگرسیون گام به گام نیز نشان داده شد در دختران سه متغیر کیفیت فضای خانواده، احساس تعلق به مدرسه و نگرش به رفتار پرخاشگرانه به طور معناداری میزان رفتارهای زورگویانه را پیش بینی می کنند، اما در پسران فقط متغیر تکانشگری توانست پیش بینی معناداری داشته باشد. نهایتاً، تلویحات و کاربردهای یافته‏ها مورد بحث قرار گرفته است .
کلیدواژه‌ها
رفتار زورگویانه
کیفیت فضای خانواده
افسردگی
تکانشگری
باورهای حامی رفتار خشن

عنوان مقاله English

the family, individual, and school correlates of bullying among students

چکیده English

The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of bullying among students and its relationship to the quality of family environment, impulsivity, depression, beliefs supportiveofaggressive behavior, and attitude towards school. The sample consisted of 344 secondary school students (205 girls and 139 boys) in Kermanshah who were selected by multistage cluster sampling method. They completed Olweus Bully/victim Questionnaire, University of Texas Depression scale, Impulsivity scale(Bosworth, 1999), Beliefs supportive of Violence (Dahlberg et al., 1998), Psychological sense of School membership scale (Goodenow, 1993), and family climate scale(Holman et al., 1994). Data was analyzed by descriptive analysis procedures and stepwise regression analysis. The results showed that different forms of bullying behaviors prevalence are 13/7 to 52/1 percent for boys, and 10/2 to 64.6 percent for girls. The most reported bullying behaviors for both of groups were name calling and teasing in hurtful way, and the least reported bullying behaviors were taking money or other thing away and damaging them. Results showed that among girls, among all studied variables have significant correlations with bullying behavior, but among boys just three variables (the quality of family climate, depression, and impulsivity) were significantly correlated with bullying behavior. Stepwise regression analysis also showed that for girls, the three variables Quality family atmosphere, a sense of belonging to school and attitudes toward violence significantly predict bullying, but for boys, only impulsivity was significant predictor.. Finally, the implications of findings are discussed.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Bullying
the quality of family climate
depression
impulsivity
beliefs supportive of violent behavior
Adams, T. A. (2000). The status of school discipline and violence. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 567, 140–156.

Arora, C. M. (1987). Defining bullying for a secondary school. Educational and Child Psychology, 3)4(, 110-120.

Bae, Hwa-ok. (2015). Bullying involvement of Korean children in Germany and in Korea. School Psychology International, 37, 3 – 17.

Bentley, K. M., & Li, A.K.F. (1995). Bully and victim problems in elementary schools and students’ beliefs about aggression. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 11, 153-165.

Bond, L., Carlin, J. and Thomas, L. (2001) ‘Does Bullying Cause Emotional Problems? A Prospective Study of Young Teenagers. British Medical Journal, 323,480–84.

Bosworth, K. Espelage, D.L. and Simon, T.R. (1999). Factors associated with bullyingbehavior in middle school students. Journal of Early Adolescence, 19 (3), 341-362.

Bowers, L., Smith, P. K., &Binney, V. (1994). Cohesion and power inthe families of children involved in bully/victim problems at school. Journal of Family Therapy, 14, 371–387.

Carney, J.V. (2000). ‘Bullied to Death: Perceptions of Peer Abuse and SuicidalBehaviour During Adolescence. School Psychology international, 21, 213–223.

Chan, J. H.(2006).Systematic Patterns in Bullying and Victimization. School Psychology International, 27(3), 352–369.

Dahlberg, L. L., Toal, S. B., Swahn, M. H. & Behrens, C. B. (1998). Measuring violence-related attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors among youths: A compendium of assessment tools: Second edition. PsycEXT RA Dataset.

Dwyer, K. P., Osher,D.,&Hoffman, C. C. (2000). Creating responsive schools: Contextualizing early warning, timely response. Exceptional Children, 66(3), 347–365.

Esbensen, F., & Carson, D. C. (2009). Consequences of Being Bullied: Results from a Longitudinal Assessment of Bullying Victimization in a Multisite Sample of American Students. Youth & Society, 41(2), 209-233.

Galloway, D. (1994). Bullying: The importance of a whole school approach. Therapeutic Care and Education, 3, 315-329.

Goodenow, C. (1993). The psychological sense of school membership among adolescents: Scaledevelopment and educational correlates. Psychology in the Schools, 30, 79-90.

Greenbaum, S., Turner, B., & Stephens, R. D. (1988). Set straight on bullies. Los Angeles: PepperdineUniversity Press.
Hemphill,S. A., Tollit, M., Kotevski, A., and Heerde, J. A.(2015). Predictors of Traditional and Cyber-Bullying Victimization: A Longitudinal Study of Australian Secondary School Students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(15) 2567–2590.

Holman, T. B., Larson, J. H., & Harmer, S. L. (1994). The development and predictive validity of a new premarital assessment instrument: The Preparation for Marriage Questionnaire. Family Relations, 43, 46–52.

Hoover, J. H., Oliver, R., &Thomson, K. (1993). Perceived victimization by school bullies: New research and future directions. Journal of Humanistic Education and Development, 32, 76-84.

Janson, G.R. and Hazler, R.J. (2004) ‘Trauma Reactions of Bystanders and Victims to Repetitive Abuse Experiences. Violence and Victims, 19, 239–255.

Kim, Y.S., Koh, Y. and Leventhal, B. (2005) ‘School Bullying and Suicidal Risk in Korean Middle School Students. Pediatrics, 115,357–63.

Klicpera, C., &Klicpera, B. G. (1996). The situation of bullies and victims of aggressive acts in school. Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie, 45, 2-9.

Kumpulainen, K., Räsänen. E. and Henttonen, I. (1998). ‘Bullying and Psychiatric Symptoms among Elementary School-Age Children. Child Abuse and Neglect, 22, 705–17.

Lee, E. (2009). The relationship of aggression and bullying to social preference: Differences in gender and types of aggression. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 33 (4), 323–330.

Nansel, T. R., Overpeck, M., Pilla, R. S., Ruan,W. J., Simons-Morton, B., &Scheidt, P.(2001). Bullying behaviors among U.S. youth: Prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285(16), 2094-2100.

Oliver, R., Hoover, J. H., &Hazler, R. (1994). The perceived roles of bullying in small-town Midwestern schools. Journal of Counseling and Development, 72, 416–420.
Olweus, D. (1978). Aggression in the schools: Bullies and whipping boys. New York: John Wiley.

Olweus, D. (1991). Bully/victim problems among schoolchildren: basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program. In D. J. Pepler& K. H. Rubin (Eds.), the development and treatment of childhood aggression .Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Olweus, D. (1994). Bullying at school: Long-term outcomes for the victims and an effective school-based intervention program. In L. R. Huesmann (Ed.), Aggressive behavior: Current perspectives (pp. 97-130). New York: Plenum.

Rigby, K. (2004).Addressing Bullying in Schools Theoretical Perspectives and Their Implications. School Psychology International, 25(3), 287–300.
Salmivalli, C. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15, 112–120.

Slee, P. T. (1995). Bullying in the playground: The impact of interpersonal violence on Australian children’s perceptions of their play environment. Children’s Environments, 12, 273-282.

Smith, P. K., Bowers, L., Binney, V., &Cowie, H. (1993). Relationships of children involved in bully/victim problems at school. In S. Duck (Ed.), Learning about relationships. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Stephens,R.D. (1994). Planning for safer and better schools: School violence prevention and intervention strategies. School Psychology Review, 23(2), 204–215.

Vaillancourt, T., McDougall, P., Hymel, S., Krygsman, A., Miller, J., Stiver, K., & Davis, C.(2008). Bullying: Are researchers and children/youth talking about the same thing? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32 (6), 486–495.

Wolke,D., Copeland, W. E., Angold, A., and Costello, E. J.(2013). Impact of Bullying in Childhood on Adult Health, Wealth, Crime, and Social Outcomes. Psychological Science, 24(10), 1958–1970.

Wong, D.S.W. (2004). School Bullying and Tackling Strategies in Hong Kong. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48(5), 537- 553.