نقش صمیمیت زوجین و باورهای معنوی و اعمال مذهبی در پیش‌بینی انسجام و سازگاری خانوادگی

نویسندگان
علی بیگی
محمدعلی محمدی فر
محمود نجفی
علی محمد رضایی
دانشگاه سمنان
10.18869/acadpub.rph.10.1.52
چکیده
پژوهش حاضر با هدف بررسی رابطه صمیمت زوجین و باورهای معنوی و اعمال مذهبی افراد با انسجام و سازگاری خانوادگی انجام گرفت. در این مطالعه توصیفی همبستگی، تعداد 234 زن و مرد متاهل از بین کارمندان و دانشجویان شهرستان­های شاهرود و میامی به صورت خوشه­ای تصادفی وارد مطالعه شدند. ابزار جمع­آوری داده­ها مقیاس صمیمیت زوجین، مقیاس تجربه معنوی و مقیاس انسجام و سازگاری خانوادگی بود. جهت تجزیه و تحلیل داده­ها از ضریب همبستگی پیرسون و تحلیل رگرسیون گام­به­گام و نرم­افزار SPSS-16 استفاده شد. نتایج تحلیل رگرسیون نشان داد که گشودگی (ریزمولفه صمیمیت زوجین)، معنایابی در زندگی و ارتباط با خداوند (ریزمولفه­های معنویت)، به ترتیب، به طور معناداری در پیش­بینی انسجام خانوادگی نقش داشتند. هم­چنین، مشکلات در صمیمیت (ریزمولفه صمیمیت زناشویی)، و فعالیت­های اجتماعی مذهبی (ریزمولفه معنویت)، به ترتیب، در پیش­بینی سازگاری خانوادگی نقش داشتند. به نظر می­رسد که افراد با تجربه معنوی بالا که روابط صمیمانه­ای را در زندگی زناشویی تجربه­کرده­اند، انسجام و سازگاری خانوادگی بالایی را گزارش می­کنند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
صمیمیت زوجین
باورهای معنوی و اعمال مذهبی
انسجام وسازگاری خانواده

عنوان مقاله English

The role of Marital intimacy and Spirituality in prediction of Family Cohesion and Adaptability

چکیده English

Family cohesion and adaptability is an emotional bind among family members and ability to change of power structure and role relationships in marital life. This study aimed to examine the relationship of marital intimacy and spirituality with family cohesion and adaptability. In this descriptive correlation study 234 married men and women that consisted of students and employees from Shahrood and Mayamey cities completed marital intimacy, spiritual experience and family cohesion and adaptability scales. Data analyzed with Pearson correlation coefficient and stepwise regression method using SPSS-16. Results showed that openness (marital intimacy subscale), and god related effect (spirituality subscale), rolled in prediction of family cohesion, as well, intimacy problems (marital intimacy subscale), and sociospritual activities (spiritual subscale), rolled in prediction of family adaptability. It seems that people with high spirituality that experience intimacy relationships in marital lives, reported high family cohesion and adaptability.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Marital intimacy
Spirituality
Family cohesion and adaptability
Algood, S., Harris, S., Skogrand, L.,& Lee, T. (2009). Marital commitment and religiosity in a religiously homogenous population. Marriage & Family Review. 45. 52-67.

Agate, S., Zabriskie, R.,& Eggett, D. (2007). Praying, Playing and successful families. Marriage and family Review. 42(2). 51-75.

Brehm, S. S., Miller, R. S., Perlman, D.,& Campbell, S. M. (2002). Intimate relationships (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Carstensen,L.L ., Graff, J., Levenson, r.w.,& Gottman, J.(1996). Handbook of Emotion, Adult Development, and Aging. Academic Press. 227-247.

Corkery, S., Curran, M.,& Parkman, A. (2011). Spirituality, Sacrifice and Relationship quality for expectant cohabitors. Marriage & family Review. 47. 345-362.

Gall, T. (2006). Spirituality and coping with life stress among adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse: child abuse& Neglect 30. 829-844.

Lambert, N. M.,& Dollahite, D. C. (2008). The threefold cord: Marital commitment inreligious couples. Journal of Family Issues, 29(5), 592_614.

Mahoney, A., Pargament, K. I., Tarakeshwar, N., & Swank, A. B. (2001). Religion in the home in the 1980s and 90s:Ameta-analytic review and conceptual analyses of links between religion, marriage and parenting. Journal of Family Psychology, 15, 559-596.

Marks, L. D.,& Dollahite, D. C. (2001). Religion, relationships, and responsible fathering in Latter-day Saint families of children with special needs. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18, 625-650.

Mahoney, A. (2010). Religion in families, 1999–2009: A relational spirituality framework. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(4), 805–827.

Moreira, H., Amaral, A.,& Canavarro, M. C. (2009). Adaptation of Personal Assessment of Intimacy in Relationships Scale (PAIR) to the Portuguesepopulation: A study of its psychometric properties. Psychological Assesment. 50, 353–373.

Nazare, B., Fonseca, A., Gamerio, S., Canavarro, M.,& Dattilio, F. (2011). Amniocentesis due to advanced maternal age: The role of marital intimacy in couples decision making process. Contemporary family therapy. 33, 128-142.

Olson, D.H. (1991). Commentary: three-dimensional Circumplex Model and revised scoring of FACES III. Family Process, 30, 74 –79.

Olson, D.H. (2011). FACES IV and the Circumplex Model: validation study, Journal of Marital Family. 37 [1]: 64-80.

Rada, C.( 2014). Family adaptability and cohesiveness evaluation scale III in Romania. Procedia. Social and Behavior Science.127: 31 – 35.

Sandhya, S. (2009). The social context of marital happiness in urban Indian couple: Interplay of intimacy and conflict. Journal of marital and family therapy. 3, 74-96.

VanDenBerghe, E. (2000). The enduring, happy marriage: Findings and implications from research. In D. C. Dollahite (Ed.), Strengthening our families (pp. 16-28). Salt Lake City, UT: Bookcraft.

Zabriskie, R. B.,& McCormick, B. P. (2001). The influences of family leisure patterns on perceptions of family functioning. Family Relations, 50, 281-289.

Zabriskie, R. B.,& Ward, P. (2013). Satisfaction with family life scale. Marriage & Family Review. 49, 446-463.

Van den Broucke, S., Vertommen, H.,& Vandereycken, W. (1995). Construction and alidation of a marital intimacy questionnaire. Family Relations, 44, 285–290.